AI Verdict
WFC has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
MS vs WFC Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | MS | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.3B | $87.3B |
| Net Income | $5.6B | $21.3B |
| Net Margin | 36.4% | 24.4% |
| ROE | 4.9% | 11.8% |
| ROA | 0.4% | 1.0% |
| Current Ratio | N/A | N/A |
| Debt/Equity | 3.18x | 0.96x |
| EPS | $3.43 | $6.26 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
MS vs WFC: Frequently Asked Questions
Is MS or WFC the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), WFC has stronger fundamentals. MS is graded C (78% confidence) while WFC is graded B (70% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does MS compare to WFC fundamentally?
MORGAN STANLEY has ROE of 4.9% vs WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN's 11.8%. Net margins are 36.4% vs 24.4% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, MS or WFC?
MS has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while WFC has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in MS or WFC for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that MS has a C grade with 78% confidence, while WFC has a B grade with 70% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about MS vs WFC?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For MS vs WFC, the AI consensus favors WFC based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.