AI Verdict
COST has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
COST vs GIS Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | COST | GIS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $207.4B | $18.4B |
| Net Income | $6.2B | $-87.6M |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | -0.5% |
| ROE | 18.6% | -1.2% |
| ROA | 7.2% | -0.3% |
| Current Ratio | 1.07x | 0.68x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.17x | 1.83x |
| EPS | $14.01 | $-0.16 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
COST vs GIS: Frequently Asked Questions
Is COST or GIS the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), COST has stronger fundamentals. COST is graded A (80% confidence) while GIS is graded C (88% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does COST compare to GIS fundamentally?
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW has ROE of 18.6% vs GENERAL MILLS INC's -1.2%. Net margins are 3.0% vs -0.5% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, COST or GIS?
COST has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while GIS has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in COST or GIS for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that COST has a A grade with 80% confidence, while GIS has a C grade with 88% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about COST vs GIS?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For COST vs GIS, the AI consensus favors COST based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.