AI Verdict
AAPL has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
COST vs AAPL Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | COST | AAPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $136.9B | $254.9B |
| Net Income | $4.0B | $71.7B |
| Net Margin | 2.9% | 28.1% |
| ROE | 12.6% | 67.3% |
| ROA | 4.8% | 19.3% |
| Current Ratio | 1.06x | 1.07x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.18x | 0.78x |
| EPS | $9.08 | $4.85 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
COST vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
Is COST or AAPL the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), AAPL has stronger fundamentals. COST is graded A (81% confidence) while AAPL is graded A (87% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does COST compare to AAPL fundamentally?
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW has ROE of 12.6% vs Apple Inc.'s 67.3%. Net margins are 2.9% vs 28.1% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, COST or AAPL?
COST has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while AAPL has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in COST or AAPL for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that COST has a A grade with 81% confidence, while AAPL has a A grade with 87% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about COST vs AAPL?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For COST vs AAPL, the AI consensus favors AAPL based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.