AI Verdict
COST has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
AMZN vs COST Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | AMZN | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $181.5B | $207.4B |
| Net Income | $90.8B | $6.2B |
| Net Margin | 50.0% | 3.0% |
| ROE | 20.5% | 18.6% |
| ROA | 9.9% | 7.2% |
| Current Ratio | 1.18x | 1.07x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.28x | 0.17x |
| EPS | $2.78 | $14.01 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
AMZN vs COST: Frequently Asked Questions
Is AMZN or COST the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), COST has stronger fundamentals. AMZN is graded A (74% confidence) while COST is graded A (80% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does AMZN compare to COST fundamentally?
AMAZON COM INC has ROE of 20.5% vs COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW's 18.6%. Net margins are 50.0% vs 3.0% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, AMZN or COST?
AMZN has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while COST has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in AMZN or COST for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that AMZN has a A grade with 74% confidence, while COST has a A grade with 80% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about AMZN vs COST?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For AMZN vs COST, the AI consensus favors COST based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.