AI Verdict
NVDA has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
COST vs NVDA Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | COST | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $136.9B | $215.9B |
| Net Income | $4.0B | $120.1B |
| Net Margin | 2.9% | 55.6% |
| ROE | 12.6% | 76.3% |
| ROA | 4.8% | 58.1% |
| Current Ratio | 1.06x | 3.91x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.18x | 0.05x |
| EPS | $9.08 | $4.90 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
COST vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
Is COST or NVDA a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), NVDA has stronger fundamentals. COST is rated BUY (81% confidence) while NVDA is rated STRONG BUY (93% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does COST compare to NVDA fundamentally?
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW has ROE of 12.6% vs NVIDIA CORP's 76.3%. Net margins are 2.9% vs 55.6% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, COST or NVDA?
COST has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while NVDA has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in COST or NVDA for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that COST has BUY rating with 81% confidence, while NVDA has STRONG BUY rating with 93% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about COST vs NVDA?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For COST vs NVDA, the AI consensus favors NVDA based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.