AI Verdict
MCO has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
GS vs MCO Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | GS | MCO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.4B | $7.7B |
| Net Income | $17.2B | $2.5B |
| Net Margin | 21.4% | 31.9% |
| ROE | 13.7% | 60.7% |
| ROA | 0.9% | 15.5% |
| Current Ratio | N/A | 1.74x |
| Debt/Equity | 1.83x | 1.73x |
| EPS | $51.32 | $13.67 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
GS vs MCO: Frequently Asked Questions
Is GS or MCO a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), MCO has stronger fundamentals. GS is rated HOLD (77% confidence) while MCO is rated BUY (82% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does GS compare to MCO fundamentally?
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC has ROE of 13.7% vs MOODYS CORP /DE/'s 60.7%. Net margins are 21.4% vs 31.9% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, GS or MCO?
GS has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while MCO has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in GS or MCO for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that GS has HOLD rating with 77% confidence, while MCO has BUY rating with 82% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about GS vs MCO?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For GS vs MCO, the AI consensus favors MCO based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.