AI Verdict
XOM has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
FANG vs XOM Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | FANG | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.0B | $332.2B |
| Net Income | $1.7B | $28.8B |
| Net Margin | 11.1% | 8.7% |
| ROE | 4.5% | 11.1% |
| ROA | 2.3% | 6.4% |
| Current Ratio | 0.42x | 1.15x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.37x | 0.13x |
| EPS | $5.73 | $6.70 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
FANG vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
Is FANG or XOM a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), XOM has stronger fundamentals. FANG is rated BUY (74% confidence) while XOM is rated BUY (77% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does FANG compare to XOM fundamentally?
Diamondback Energy, Inc. has ROE of 4.5% vs EXXON MOBIL CORP's 11.1%. Net margins are 11.1% vs 8.7% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, FANG or XOM?
FANG has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while XOM has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in FANG or XOM for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that FANG has BUY rating with 74% confidence, while XOM has BUY rating with 77% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about FANG vs XOM?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For FANG vs XOM, the AI consensus favors XOM based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.