AI Verdict
COST has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
COST vs STZ Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | COST | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $207.4B | $7.2B |
| Net Income | $6.2B | $1.5B |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 20.6% |
| ROE | 18.6% | 19.3% |
| ROA | 7.2% | 6.8% |
| Current Ratio | 1.07x | 1.34x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.17x | 1.33x |
| EPS | $14.01 | N/A |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
COST vs STZ: Frequently Asked Questions
Is COST or STZ the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), COST has stronger fundamentals. COST is graded A (80% confidence) while STZ is graded C (68% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does COST compare to STZ fundamentally?
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW has ROE of 18.6% vs CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.'s 19.3%. Net margins are 3.0% vs 20.6% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, COST or STZ?
COST has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while STZ has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in COST or STZ for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that COST has a A grade with 80% confidence, while STZ has a C grade with 68% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about COST vs STZ?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For COST vs STZ, the AI consensus favors COST based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.