AI Verdict
MNST has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
COST vs MNST Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | COST | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $136.9B | $8.3B |
| Net Income | $4.0B | $1.9B |
| Net Margin | 2.9% | 23.0% |
| ROE | 12.6% | 23.1% |
| ROA | 4.8% | 19.1% |
| Current Ratio | 1.06x | 3.70x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.18x | 0.02x |
| EPS | $9.08 | $1.49 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
COST vs MNST: Frequently Asked Questions
Is COST or MNST a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), MNST has stronger fundamentals. COST is rated BUY (81% confidence) while MNST is rated BUY (84% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does COST compare to MNST fundamentally?
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW has ROE of 12.6% vs Monster Beverage Corp's 23.1%. Net margins are 2.9% vs 23.0% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, COST or MNST?
COST has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while MNST has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in COST or MNST for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that COST has BUY rating with 81% confidence, while MNST has BUY rating with 84% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about COST vs MNST?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For COST vs MNST, the AI consensus favors MNST based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.