AI Verdict
COST has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
COST vs KR Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | COST | KR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $136.9B | $112.9B |
| Net Income | $4.0B | $155.0M |
| Net Margin | 2.9% | 0.1% |
| ROE | 12.6% | 2.2% |
| ROA | 4.8% | 0.3% |
| Current Ratio | 1.06x | 0.88x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.18x | 2.27x |
| EPS | $9.08 | $0.23 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
COST vs KR: Frequently Asked Questions
Is COST or KR a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), COST has stronger fundamentals. COST is rated BUY (81% confidence) while KR is rated HOLD (70% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does COST compare to KR fundamentally?
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW has ROE of 12.6% vs KROGER CO's 2.2%. Net margins are 2.9% vs 0.1% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, COST or KR?
COST has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while KR has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in COST or KR for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that COST has BUY rating with 81% confidence, while KR has HOLD rating with 70% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about COST vs KR?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For COST vs KR, the AI consensus favors COST based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.