AI Verdict
COST has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
COST vs KMB Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | COST | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $136.9B | $4.2B |
| Net Income | $4.0B | $665.0M |
| Net Margin | 2.9% | 16.0% |
| ROE | 12.6% | 37.0% |
| ROA | 4.8% | 3.9% |
| Current Ratio | 1.06x | 0.77x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.18x | 3.61x |
| EPS | $9.08 | $2.00 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
COST vs KMB: Frequently Asked Questions
Is COST or KMB the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), COST has stronger fundamentals. COST is graded A (81% confidence) while KMB is graded C (76% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does COST compare to KMB fundamentally?
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW has ROE of 12.6% vs KIMBERLY CLARK CORP's 37.0%. Net margins are 2.9% vs 16.0% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, COST or KMB?
COST has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while KMB has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in COST or KMB for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that COST has a A grade with 81% confidence, while KMB has a C grade with 76% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about COST vs KMB?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For COST vs KMB, the AI consensus favors COST based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.