AI Verdict
COST has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
COST vs KHC Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | COST | KHC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $207.4B | $6.0B |
| Net Income | $6.2B | $798.0M |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 13.2% |
| ROE | 18.6% | 1.9% |
| ROA | 7.2% | 1.0% |
| Current Ratio | 1.07x | 1.20x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.17x | 0.46x |
| EPS | $14.01 | $0.67 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
COST vs KHC: Frequently Asked Questions
Is COST or KHC the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), COST has stronger fundamentals. COST is graded A (80% confidence) while KHC is graded C (76% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does COST compare to KHC fundamentally?
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW has ROE of 18.6% vs Kraft Heinz Co's 1.9%. Net margins are 3.0% vs 13.2% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, COST or KHC?
COST has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while KHC has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in COST or KHC for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that COST has a A grade with 80% confidence, while KHC has a C grade with 76% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about COST vs KHC?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For COST vs KHC, the AI consensus favors COST based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.