AI Verdict
COST has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
COST vs EP Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | COST | EP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $136.9B | $5.1M |
| Net Income | $4.0B | $-6.6M |
| Net Margin | 2.9% | -130.2% |
| ROE | 12.6% | -180.0% |
| ROA | 4.8% | -8.5% |
| Current Ratio | 1.06x | 0.59x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.18x | 4.12x |
| EPS | $9.08 | $-0.18 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
COST vs EP: Frequently Asked Questions
Is COST or EP the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), COST has stronger fundamentals. COST is graded A (81% confidence) while EP is graded D (95% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does COST compare to EP fundamentally?
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW has ROE of 12.6% vs EMPIRE PETROLEUM CORP's -180.0%. Net margins are 2.9% vs -130.2% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, COST or EP?
COST has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while EP has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in COST or EP for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that COST has a A grade with 81% confidence, while EP has a D grade with 95% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about COST vs EP?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For COST vs EP, the AI consensus favors COST based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.