AI Verdict
MO has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
ADM vs MO Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | ADM | MO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.3B | $23.3B |
| Net Income | $1.1B | $6.9B |
| Net Margin | 1.3% | 29.8% |
| ROE | 4.7% | N/A |
| ROA | 2.1% | 19.8% |
| Current Ratio | 1.37x | 0.65x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.33x | N/A |
| EPS | $2.23 | $4.12 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
ADM vs MO: Frequently Asked Questions
Is ADM or MO a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), MO has stronger fundamentals. ADM is rated HOLD (70% confidence) while MO is rated HOLD (77% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does ADM compare to MO fundamentally?
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co has ROE of 4.7% vs ALTRIA GROUP, INC.'s N/A. Net margins are 1.3% vs 29.8% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, ADM or MO?
ADM has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while MO has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in ADM or MO for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that ADM has HOLD rating with 70% confidence, while MO has HOLD rating with 77% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about ADM vs MO?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For ADM vs MO, the AI consensus favors MO based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.