AI Verdict
COST has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
ADM vs COST Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | ADM | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.5B | $207.4B |
| Net Income | $298.0M | $6.2B |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | 3.0% |
| ROE | 1.3% | 18.6% |
| ROA | 0.5% | 7.2% |
| Current Ratio | 1.31x | 1.07x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.28x | 0.17x |
| EPS | $0.62 | $14.01 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
ADM vs COST: Frequently Asked Questions
Is ADM or COST the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), COST has stronger fundamentals. ADM is graded C (81% confidence) while COST is graded A (80% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does ADM compare to COST fundamentally?
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co has ROE of 1.3% vs COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW's 18.6%. Net margins are 1.5% vs 3.0% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, ADM or COST?
ADM has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while COST has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in ADM or COST for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that ADM has a C grade with 81% confidence, while COST has a A grade with 80% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about ADM vs COST?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For ADM vs COST, the AI consensus favors COST based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.