AI Verdict
COST has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
ADM vs COST Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | ADM | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.3B | $136.9B |
| Net Income | $1.1B | $4.0B |
| Net Margin | 1.3% | 2.9% |
| ROE | 4.7% | 12.6% |
| ROA | 2.1% | 4.8% |
| Current Ratio | 1.37x | 1.06x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.33x | 0.18x |
| EPS | $2.23 | $9.08 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
ADM vs COST: Frequently Asked Questions
Is ADM or COST a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), COST has stronger fundamentals. ADM is rated HOLD (70% confidence) while COST is rated BUY (81% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does ADM compare to COST fundamentally?
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co has ROE of 4.7% vs COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW's 12.6%. Net margins are 1.3% vs 2.9% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, ADM or COST?
ADM has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while COST has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in ADM or COST for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that ADM has HOLD rating with 70% confidence, while COST has BUY rating with 81% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about ADM vs COST?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For ADM vs COST, the AI consensus favors COST based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.