SPGI vs AAPL: Which is Better to Buy in 2026?

Side-by-side fundamental comparison based on AI analysis of SEC filings

AI Verdict

AAPL has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.

SPGI
S&P Global Inc.
BUY
81%
Confidence
VS
AAPL
Apple Inc.
BUY
87%
Confidence

SPGI vs AAPL Fundamental Comparison

Metric SPGI AAPL
Revenue $15.3B $143.8B
Net Income $4.5B $42.1B
Net Margin 29.2% 29.3%
ROE 14.4% 47.7%
ROA 7.3% 11.1%
Current Ratio 0.82x 0.97x
Debt/Equity 0.42x 1.00x
EPS $14.66 $2.84

Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric

View Full SPGI Analysis →
View Full AAPL Analysis →
Browse Sectors: Technology Healthcare Finance Energy Consumer Industrial
Stock Lists: Strong Buy Undervalued Growth Dividend

You Might Also Compare

SPGI vs MSFT AAPL vs GOOGL SPGI vs AMZN AAPL vs NVDA

SPGI vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions

Is SPGI or AAPL a better buy in 2026?

Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), AAPL has stronger fundamentals. SPGI is rated BUY (81% confidence) while AAPL is rated BUY (87% confidence). This is not investment advice.

How does SPGI compare to AAPL fundamentally?

S&P Global Inc. has ROE of 14.4% vs Apple Inc.'s 47.7%. Net margins are 29.2% vs 29.3% respectively.

Which stock pays higher dividends, SPGI or AAPL?

SPGI has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while AAPL has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.

Should I invest in SPGI or AAPL for long term?

For long-term investing, consider that SPGI has BUY rating with 81% confidence, while AAPL has BUY rating with 87% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.

What do the AI models say about SPGI vs AAPL?

Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For SPGI vs AAPL, the AI consensus favors AAPL based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.