RCL vs AAPL: Which is Better to Buy in 2026?

Side-by-side fundamental comparison based on AI analysis of SEC filings

AI Verdict

AAPL has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.

RCL
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD
A
72%
Confidence
VS
AAPL
Apple Inc.
A
87%
Confidence

RCL vs AAPL Fundamental Comparison

Metric RCL AAPL
Revenue $4.5B $254.9B
Net Income $941.0M $71.7B
Net Margin 21.1% 28.1%
ROE 9.6% 67.3%
ROA 2.2% 19.3%
Current Ratio 0.20x 1.07x
Debt/Equity 2.00x 0.78x
EPS $3.48 $4.85

Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric

View Full RCL Analysis →
View Full AAPL Analysis →
Browse Sectors: Technology Healthcare Finance Energy Consumer Industrial
Stock Lists: Top Rated Undervalued Growth Dividend

You Might Also Compare

RCL vs MSFT AAPL vs GOOGL RCL vs AMZN AAPL vs NVDA

RCL vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions

Is RCL or AAPL the better stock in 2026?

Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), AAPL has stronger fundamentals. RCL is graded A (72% confidence) while AAPL is graded A (87% confidence). This is not investment advice.

How does RCL compare to AAPL fundamentally?

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD has ROE of 9.6% vs Apple Inc.'s 67.3%. Net margins are 21.1% vs 28.1% respectively.

Which stock pays higher dividends, RCL or AAPL?

RCL has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while AAPL has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.

Should I invest in RCL or AAPL for long term?

For long-term investing, consider that RCL has a A grade with 72% confidence, while AAPL has a A grade with 87% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.

What do the AI models say about RCL vs AAPL?

Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For RCL vs AAPL, the AI consensus favors AAPL based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.