AI Verdict
STZ has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
MO vs STZ Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | MO | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $2.4B |
| Net Income | $2.2B | $653.8M |
| Net Margin | 40.2% | 26.9% |
| ROE | N/A | 7.9% |
| ROA | 6.3% | 3.0% |
| Current Ratio | 0.62x | 0.91x |
| Debt/Equity | N/A | 1.24x |
| EPS | $1.30 | N/A |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
MO vs STZ: Frequently Asked Questions
Is MO or STZ the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), STZ has stronger fundamentals. MO is graded C (84% confidence) while STZ is graded B (78% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does MO compare to STZ fundamentally?
ALTRIA GROUP, INC. has ROE of N/A vs CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.'s 7.9%. Net margins are 40.2% vs 26.9% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, MO or STZ?
MO has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while STZ has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in MO or STZ for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that MO has a C grade with 84% confidence, while STZ has a B grade with 78% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about MO vs STZ?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For MO vs STZ, the AI consensus favors STZ based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.