AI Verdict
MA has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
MA vs WFC Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | MA | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.8B | $87.3B |
| Net Income | $15.0B | $21.3B |
| Net Margin | 45.6% | 24.4% |
| ROE | 193.5% | 11.8% |
| ROA | 27.6% | 1.0% |
| Current Ratio | 1.03x | N/A |
| Debt/Equity | 2.36x | 0.96x |
| EPS | $16.52 | $6.26 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
MA vs WFC: Frequently Asked Questions
Is MA or WFC a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), MA has stronger fundamentals. MA is rated STRONG BUY (92% confidence) while WFC is rated HOLD (70% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does MA compare to WFC fundamentally?
Mastercard Inc has ROE of 193.5% vs WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN's 11.8%. Net margins are 45.6% vs 24.4% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, MA or WFC?
MA has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while WFC has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in MA or WFC for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that MA has STRONG BUY rating with 92% confidence, while WFC has HOLD rating with 70% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about MA vs WFC?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For MA vs WFC, the AI consensus favors MA based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.