LRCX vs NVDA: Which is Better to Buy in 2026?

Side-by-side fundamental comparison based on AI analysis of SEC filings

AI Verdict

NVDA has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.

LRCX
LAM RESEARCH CORP
A
86%
Confidence
VS
NVDA
NVIDIA CORP
A+
90%
Confidence

LRCX vs NVDA Fundamental Comparison

Metric LRCX NVDA
Revenue $16.5B $81.6B
Net Income $5.0B $58.3B
Net Margin 30.2% 71.5%
ROE 47.1% 29.8%
ROA 24.0% 22.5%
Current Ratio 2.54x 3.44x
Debt/Equity 0.35x 0.04x
EPS $3.95 $2.39

Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric

View Full LRCX Analysis →
View Full NVDA Analysis →
Browse Sectors: Technology Healthcare Finance Energy Consumer Industrial
Stock Lists: Top Rated Undervalued Growth Dividend

You Might Also Compare

LRCX vs AAPL NVDA vs MSFT LRCX vs GOOGL NVDA vs AMZN

LRCX vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions

Is LRCX or NVDA the better stock in 2026?

Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), NVDA has stronger fundamentals. LRCX is graded A (86% confidence) while NVDA is graded A+ (90% confidence). This is not investment advice.

How does LRCX compare to NVDA fundamentally?

LAM RESEARCH CORP has ROE of 47.1% vs NVIDIA CORP's 29.8%. Net margins are 30.2% vs 71.5% respectively.

Which stock pays higher dividends, LRCX or NVDA?

LRCX has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while NVDA has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.

Should I invest in LRCX or NVDA for long term?

For long-term investing, consider that LRCX has a A grade with 86% confidence, while NVDA has a A+ grade with 90% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.

What do the AI models say about LRCX vs NVDA?

Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For LRCX vs NVDA, the AI consensus favors NVDA based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.