ITW vs AAPL: Which is Better to Buy in 2026?

Side-by-side fundamental comparison based on AI analysis of SEC filings

AI Verdict

AAPL has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.

ITW
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
BUY
82%
Confidence
VS
AAPL
Apple Inc.
BUY
87%
Confidence

ITW vs AAPL Fundamental Comparison

Metric ITW AAPL
Revenue $16.0B $143.8B
Net Income $3.1B $42.1B
Net Margin 19.1% 29.3%
ROE 95.0% 47.7%
ROA 19.0% 11.1%
Current Ratio 1.21x 0.97x
Debt/Equity 2.38x 1.00x
EPS $10.49 $2.84

Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric

View Full ITW Analysis →
View Full AAPL Analysis →
Browse Sectors: Technology Healthcare Finance Energy Consumer Industrial
Stock Lists: Strong Buy Undervalued Growth Dividend

You Might Also Compare

ITW vs MSFT AAPL vs GOOGL ITW vs AMZN AAPL vs NVDA

ITW vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions

Is ITW or AAPL a better buy in 2026?

Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), AAPL has stronger fundamentals. ITW is rated BUY (82% confidence) while AAPL is rated BUY (87% confidence). This is not investment advice.

How does ITW compare to AAPL fundamentally?

ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC has ROE of 95.0% vs Apple Inc.'s 47.7%. Net margins are 19.1% vs 29.3% respectively.

Which stock pays higher dividends, ITW or AAPL?

ITW has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while AAPL has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.

Should I invest in ITW or AAPL for long term?

For long-term investing, consider that ITW has BUY rating with 82% confidence, while AAPL has BUY rating with 87% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.

What do the AI models say about ITW vs AAPL?

Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For ITW vs AAPL, the AI consensus favors AAPL based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.