AI Verdict
GS has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
GS vs WFC Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | GS | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.4B | $87.3B |
| Net Income | $17.2B | $21.3B |
| Net Margin | 21.4% | 24.4% |
| ROE | 13.7% | 11.8% |
| ROA | 0.9% | 1.0% |
| Current Ratio | N/A | N/A |
| Debt/Equity | 1.83x | 0.96x |
| EPS | $51.32 | $6.26 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
GS vs WFC: Frequently Asked Questions
Is GS or WFC a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), GS has stronger fundamentals. GS is rated HOLD (77% confidence) while WFC is rated HOLD (70% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does GS compare to WFC fundamentally?
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC has ROE of 13.7% vs WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN's 11.8%. Net margins are 21.4% vs 24.4% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, GS or WFC?
GS has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while WFC has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in GS or WFC for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that GS has HOLD rating with 77% confidence, while WFC has HOLD rating with 70% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about GS vs WFC?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For GS vs WFC, the AI consensus favors GS based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.