AI Verdict
ICE has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
GS vs ICE Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | GS | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.4B | $12.6B |
| Net Income | $17.2B | $3.3B |
| Net Margin | 21.4% | 26.2% |
| ROE | 13.7% | 11.5% |
| ROA | 0.9% | 2.4% |
| Current Ratio | N/A | 1.02x |
| Debt/Equity | 1.83x | 0.64x |
| EPS | $51.32 | $5.77 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
GS vs ICE: Frequently Asked Questions
Is GS or ICE a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), ICE has stronger fundamentals. GS is rated HOLD (77% confidence) while ICE is rated BUY (78% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does GS compare to ICE fundamentally?
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC has ROE of 13.7% vs Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.'s 11.5%. Net margins are 21.4% vs 26.2% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, GS or ICE?
GS has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while ICE has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in GS or ICE for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that GS has HOLD rating with 77% confidence, while ICE has BUY rating with 78% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about GS vs ICE?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For GS vs ICE, the AI consensus favors ICE based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.