GILD vs LLY: Which is Better to Buy in 2026?

Side-by-side fundamental comparison based on AI analysis of SEC filings

AI Verdict

LLY has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.

GILD
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
BUY
82%
Confidence
VS
LLY
ELI LILLY & Co
BUY
90%
Confidence

GILD vs LLY Fundamental Comparison

Metric GILD LLY
Revenue $29.4B $65.2B
Net Income $8.5B $20.6B
Net Margin 28.9% 31.7%
ROE 37.5% 77.8%
ROA 14.4% 18.4%
Current Ratio 1.55x 1.58x
Debt/Equity 1.10x 1.54x
EPS $6.78 $22.95

Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric

View Full GILD Analysis →
View Full LLY Analysis →
Browse Sectors: Technology Healthcare Finance Energy Consumer Industrial
Stock Lists: Strong Buy Undervalued Growth Dividend

You Might Also Compare

GILD vs AAPL LLY vs MSFT GILD vs GOOGL LLY vs AMZN

GILD vs LLY: Frequently Asked Questions

Is GILD or LLY a better buy in 2026?

Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), LLY has stronger fundamentals. GILD is rated BUY (82% confidence) while LLY is rated BUY (90% confidence). This is not investment advice.

How does GILD compare to LLY fundamentally?

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. has ROE of 37.5% vs ELI LILLY & Co's 77.8%. Net margins are 28.9% vs 31.7% respectively.

Which stock pays higher dividends, GILD or LLY?

GILD has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while LLY has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.

Should I invest in GILD or LLY for long term?

For long-term investing, consider that GILD has BUY rating with 82% confidence, while LLY has BUY rating with 90% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.

What do the AI models say about GILD vs LLY?

Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For GILD vs LLY, the AI consensus favors LLY based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.