AI Verdict
MU has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
CSCO vs MU Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | CSCO | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.2B | $37.5B |
| Net Income | $6.0B | $19.0B |
| Net Margin | 20.0% | 50.7% |
| ROE | 12.6% | 26.3% |
| ROA | 4.9% | 18.7% |
| Current Ratio | 0.96x | 2.90x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.52x | 0.13x |
| EPS | $1.51 | $16.68 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
CSCO vs MU: Frequently Asked Questions
Is CSCO or MU a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), MU has stronger fundamentals. CSCO is rated BUY (78% confidence) while MU is rated BUY (87% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does CSCO compare to MU fundamentally?
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. has ROE of 12.6% vs MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC's 26.3%. Net margins are 20.0% vs 50.7% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, CSCO or MU?
CSCO has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while MU has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in CSCO or MU for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that CSCO has BUY rating with 78% confidence, while MU has BUY rating with 87% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about CSCO vs MU?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For CSCO vs MU, the AI consensus favors MU based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.