AI Verdict
COST has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
CL vs COST Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | CL | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.3B | $136.9B |
| Net Income | $646.0M | $4.0B |
| Net Margin | 12.1% | 2.9% |
| ROE | 445.5% | 12.6% |
| ROA | 3.9% | 4.8% |
| Current Ratio | 1.02x | 1.06x |
| Debt/Equity | 54.74x | 0.18x |
| EPS | $0.80 | $9.08 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
CL vs COST: Frequently Asked Questions
Is CL or COST the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), COST has stronger fundamentals. CL is graded B (68% confidence) while COST is graded A (81% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does CL compare to COST fundamentally?
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO has ROE of 445.5% vs COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW's 12.6%. Net margins are 12.1% vs 2.9% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, CL or COST?
CL has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while COST has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in CL or COST for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that CL has a B grade with 68% confidence, while COST has a A grade with 81% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about CL vs COST?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For CL vs COST, the AI consensus favors COST based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.