AI Verdict
LLY has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
CI vs LLY Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | CI | LLY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $274.9B | $65.2B |
| Net Income | $6.0B | $20.6B |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 31.7% |
| ROE | 14.3% | 77.8% |
| ROA | 3.8% | 18.4% |
| Current Ratio | 0.85x | 1.58x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.74x | 1.54x |
| EPS | $22.18 | $22.95 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
CI vs LLY: Frequently Asked Questions
Is CI or LLY a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), LLY has stronger fundamentals. CI is rated BUY (76% confidence) while LLY is rated BUY (90% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does CI compare to LLY fundamentally?
Cigna Group has ROE of 14.3% vs ELI LILLY & Co's 77.8%. Net margins are 2.2% vs 31.7% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, CI or LLY?
CI has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while LLY has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in CI or LLY for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that CI has BUY rating with 76% confidence, while LLY has BUY rating with 90% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about CI vs LLY?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For CI vs LLY, the AI consensus favors LLY based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.