AI Verdict
LLY has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
CI vs LLY Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | CI | LLY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $68.5B | $19.8B |
| Net Income | $1.7B | $7.4B |
| Net Margin | 2.4% | 37.4% |
| ROE | 3.9% | 23.7% |
| ROA | 1.1% | 6.3% |
| Current Ratio | 0.82x | 1.50x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.70x | 1.26x |
| EPS | $6.26 | $8.26 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
CI vs LLY: Frequently Asked Questions
Is CI or LLY the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), LLY has stronger fundamentals. CI is graded B (68% confidence) while LLY is graded A (86% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does CI compare to LLY fundamentally?
Cigna Group has ROE of 3.9% vs ELI LILLY & Co's 23.7%. Net margins are 2.4% vs 37.4% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, CI or LLY?
CI has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while LLY has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in CI or LLY for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that CI has a B grade with 68% confidence, while LLY has a A grade with 86% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about CI vs LLY?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For CI vs LLY, the AI consensus favors LLY based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.