BAX vs JNJ: Which is Better to Buy in 2026?

Side-by-side fundamental comparison based on AI analysis of SEC filings

AI Verdict

JNJ has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.

BAX
BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC
SELL
84%
Confidence
VS
JNJ
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
BUY
86%
Confidence

BAX vs JNJ Fundamental Comparison

Metric BAX JNJ
Revenue $2.7B $94.2B
Net Income $-15.0M $26.8B
Net Margin -0.6% 28.5%
ROE -0.2% 32.9%
ROA -0.1% 13.5%
Current Ratio 1.85x 1.03x
Debt/Equity 1.56x 0.51x
EPS $-0.03 $11.03

Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric

View Full BAX Analysis →
View Full JNJ Analysis →
Browse Sectors: Technology Healthcare Finance Energy Consumer Industrial
Stock Lists: Strong Buy Undervalued Growth Dividend

You Might Also Compare

BAX vs AAPL JNJ vs MSFT BAX vs GOOGL JNJ vs AMZN

BAX vs JNJ: Frequently Asked Questions

Is BAX or JNJ a better buy in 2026?

Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), JNJ has stronger fundamentals. BAX is rated SELL (84% confidence) while JNJ is rated BUY (86% confidence). This is not investment advice.

How does BAX compare to JNJ fundamentally?

BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC has ROE of -0.2% vs JOHNSON & JOHNSON's 32.9%. Net margins are -0.6% vs 28.5% respectively.

Which stock pays higher dividends, BAX or JNJ?

BAX has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while JNJ has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.

Should I invest in BAX or JNJ for long term?

For long-term investing, consider that BAX has SELL rating with 84% confidence, while JNJ has BUY rating with 86% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.

What do the AI models say about BAX vs JNJ?

Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For BAX vs JNJ, the AI consensus favors JNJ based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.