AMT vs AAPL: Which is Better to Buy in 2026?

Side-by-side fundamental comparison based on AI analysis of SEC filings

AI Verdict

AAPL has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.

AMT
AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/
BUY
75%
Confidence
VS
AAPL
Apple Inc.
BUY
87%
Confidence

AMT vs AAPL Fundamental Comparison

Metric AMT AAPL
Revenue $10.6B $143.8B
Net Income $2.5B $42.1B
Net Margin 23.8% 29.3%
ROE 69.3% 47.7%
ROA 4.0% 11.1%
Current Ratio 0.40x 0.97x
Debt/Equity 9.26x 1.00x
EPS $5.40 $2.84

Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric

View Full AMT Analysis →
View Full AAPL Analysis →
Browse Sectors: Technology Healthcare Finance Energy Consumer Industrial
Stock Lists: Strong Buy Undervalued Growth Dividend

You Might Also Compare

AMT vs MSFT AAPL vs GOOGL AMT vs AMZN AAPL vs NVDA

AMT vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions

Is AMT or AAPL a better buy in 2026?

Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), AAPL has stronger fundamentals. AMT is rated BUY (75% confidence) while AAPL is rated BUY (87% confidence). This is not investment advice.

How does AMT compare to AAPL fundamentally?

AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/ has ROE of 69.3% vs Apple Inc.'s 47.7%. Net margins are 23.8% vs 29.3% respectively.

Which stock pays higher dividends, AMT or AAPL?

AMT has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while AAPL has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.

Should I invest in AMT or AAPL for long term?

For long-term investing, consider that AMT has BUY rating with 75% confidence, while AAPL has BUY rating with 87% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.

What do the AI models say about AMT vs AAPL?

Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For AMT vs AAPL, the AI consensus favors AAPL based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.