AI Verdict
MA has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
AFL vs MA Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | AFL | MA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.3B | $8.4B |
| Net Income | $1.0B | $3.9B |
| Net Margin | 23.4% | 46.2% |
| ROE | 3.4% | 57.8% |
| ROA | 0.9% | 7.4% |
| Current Ratio | N/A | 0.98x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.28x | 2.56x |
| EPS | $1.98 | $4.35 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
AFL vs MA: Frequently Asked Questions
Is AFL or MA the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), MA has stronger fundamentals. AFL is graded C (72% confidence) while MA is graded A+ (88% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does AFL compare to MA fundamentally?
AFLAC INC has ROE of 3.4% vs Mastercard Inc's 57.8%. Net margins are 23.4% vs 46.2% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, AFL or MA?
AFL has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while MA has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in AFL or MA for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that AFL has a C grade with 72% confidence, while MA has a A+ grade with 88% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about AFL vs MA?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For AFL vs MA, the AI consensus favors MA based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.