AI Verdict
META has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
ADSK vs META Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | ADSK | META |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $56.3B |
| Net Income | $491.0M | $26.8B |
| Net Margin | 25.4% | 47.5% |
| ROE | 15.4% | 11.0% |
| ROA | 4.1% | 6.8% |
| Current Ratio | 0.83x | 2.35x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.78x | 0.24x |
| EPS | $2.32 | $10.44 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
ADSK vs META: Frequently Asked Questions
Is ADSK or META the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), META has stronger fundamentals. ADSK is graded A (77% confidence) while META is graded A (86% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does ADSK compare to META fundamentally?
Autodesk, Inc. has ROE of 15.4% vs Meta Platforms, Inc.'s 11.0%. Net margins are 25.4% vs 47.5% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, ADSK or META?
ADSK has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while META has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in ADSK or META for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that ADSK has a A grade with 77% confidence, while META has a A grade with 86% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about ADSK vs META?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For ADSK vs META, the AI consensus favors META based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.