AI Verdict
META has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
ADSK vs META Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | ADSK | META |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.2B | $201.0B |
| Net Income | $1.1B | $60.5B |
| Net Margin | 15.6% | 30.1% |
| ROE | 36.9% | 27.8% |
| ROA | 9.0% | 16.5% |
| Current Ratio | 0.85x | 2.60x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.82x | 0.27x |
| EPS | $5.23 | $23.49 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
ADSK vs META: Frequently Asked Questions
Is ADSK or META a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), META has stronger fundamentals. ADSK is rated BUY (80% confidence) while META is rated BUY (88% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does ADSK compare to META fundamentally?
Autodesk, Inc. has ROE of 36.9% vs Meta Platforms, Inc.'s 27.8%. Net margins are 15.6% vs 30.1% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, ADSK or META?
ADSK has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while META has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in ADSK or META for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that ADSK has BUY rating with 80% confidence, while META has BUY rating with 88% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about ADSK vs META?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For ADSK vs META, the AI consensus favors META based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.