PM vs AAPL: Which is Better to Buy in 2026?

Side-by-side fundamental comparison based on AI analysis of SEC filings

AI Verdict

AAPL has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.

PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
BUY
70%
Confidence
VS
AAPL
Apple Inc.
BUY
87%
Confidence

PM vs AAPL Fundamental Comparison

Metric PM AAPL
Revenue $40.6B $143.8B
Net Income $11.3B $42.1B
Net Margin 27.9% 29.3%
ROE N/A 47.7%
ROA 16.4% 11.1%
Current Ratio 0.96x 0.97x
Debt/Equity N/A 1.00x
EPS $7.26 $2.84

Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric

View Full PM Analysis →
View Full AAPL Analysis →
Browse Sectors: Technology Healthcare Finance Energy Consumer Industrial
Stock Lists: Strong Buy Undervalued Growth Dividend

You Might Also Compare

PM vs MSFT AAPL vs GOOGL PM vs AMZN AAPL vs NVDA

PM vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions

Is PM or AAPL a better buy in 2026?

Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), AAPL has stronger fundamentals. PM is rated BUY (70% confidence) while AAPL is rated BUY (87% confidence). This is not investment advice.

How does PM compare to AAPL fundamentally?

Philip Morris International Inc. has ROE of N/A vs Apple Inc.'s 47.7%. Net margins are 27.9% vs 29.3% respectively.

Which stock pays higher dividends, PM or AAPL?

PM has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while AAPL has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.

Should I invest in PM or AAPL for long term?

For long-term investing, consider that PM has BUY rating with 70% confidence, while AAPL has BUY rating with 87% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.

What do the AI models say about PM vs AAPL?

Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For PM vs AAPL, the AI consensus favors AAPL based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.