PTLO vs AAPL: Which is Better to Buy in 2026?

Side-by-side fundamental comparison based on AI analysis of SEC filings

AI Verdict

AAPL has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.

PTLO
Portillo's Inc.
SELL
85%
Confidence
VS
AAPL
Apple Inc.
BUY
87%
Confidence

PTLO vs AAPL Fundamental Comparison

Metric PTLO AAPL
Revenue $732.1M $143.8B
Net Income $19.3M $42.1B
Net Margin 2.6% 29.3%
ROE 4.1% 47.7%
ROA 1.2% 11.1%
Current Ratio 0.27x 0.97x
Debt/Equity 0.71x 1.00x
EPS $0.27 $2.84

Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric

View Full PTLO Analysis →
View Full AAPL Analysis →
Browse Sectors: Technology Healthcare Finance Energy Consumer Industrial
Stock Lists: Strong Buy Undervalued Growth Dividend

You Might Also Compare

PTLO vs MSFT AAPL vs GOOGL PTLO vs AMZN AAPL vs NVDA

PTLO vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions

Is PTLO or AAPL a better buy in 2026?

Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), AAPL has stronger fundamentals. PTLO is rated SELL (85% confidence) while AAPL is rated BUY (87% confidence). This is not investment advice.

How does PTLO compare to AAPL fundamentally?

Portillo's Inc. has ROE of 4.1% vs Apple Inc.'s 47.7%. Net margins are 2.6% vs 29.3% respectively.

Which stock pays higher dividends, PTLO or AAPL?

PTLO has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while AAPL has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.

Should I invest in PTLO or AAPL for long term?

For long-term investing, consider that PTLO has SELL rating with 85% confidence, while AAPL has BUY rating with 87% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.

What do the AI models say about PTLO vs AAPL?

Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For PTLO vs AAPL, the AI consensus favors AAPL based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.