AI Verdict
AAPL has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
LW vs AAPL Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | LW | AAPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.3B | $143.8B |
| Net Income | $126.4M | $42.1B |
| Net Margin | 3.9% | 29.3% |
| ROE | 7.2% | 47.7% |
| ROA | 1.7% | 11.1% |
| Current Ratio | 1.43x | 0.97x |
| Debt/Equity | 2.13x | 1.00x |
| EPS | $0.90 | $2.84 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
LW vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
Is LW or AAPL a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), AAPL has stronger fundamentals. LW is rated HOLD (62% confidence) while AAPL is rated BUY (87% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does LW compare to AAPL fundamentally?
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. has ROE of 7.2% vs Apple Inc.'s 47.7%. Net margins are 3.9% vs 29.3% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, LW or AAPL?
LW has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while AAPL has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in LW or AAPL for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that LW has HOLD rating with 62% confidence, while AAPL has BUY rating with 87% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about LW vs AAPL?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For LW vs AAPL, the AI consensus favors AAPL based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.