AI Verdict
GVA has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
GVA vs GTX Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | GVA | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.4B | $3.6B |
| Net Income | $193.0M | $310.0M |
| Net Margin | 4.4% | 8.6% |
| ROE | 16.4% | N/A |
| ROA | 4.8% | 13.1% |
| Current Ratio | 1.22x | 0.97x |
| Debt/Equity | 1.14x | N/A |
| EPS | $3.86 | $1.52 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
GVA vs GTX: Frequently Asked Questions
Is GVA or GTX a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), GVA has stronger fundamentals. GVA is rated HOLD (72% confidence) while GTX is rated HOLD (58% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does GVA compare to GTX fundamentally?
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC has ROE of 16.4% vs Garrett Motion Inc.'s N/A. Net margins are 4.4% vs 8.6% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, GVA or GTX?
GVA has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while GTX has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in GVA or GTX for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that GVA has HOLD rating with 72% confidence, while GTX has HOLD rating with 58% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about GVA vs GTX?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For GVA vs GTX, the AI consensus favors GVA based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.