AI Verdict
FHI has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
FHI vs AAPL Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | FHI | AAPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $143.8B |
| Net Income | $403.3M | $42.1B |
| Net Margin | 22.4% | 29.3% |
| ROE | 33.7% | 47.7% |
| ROA | 18.1% | 11.1% |
| Current Ratio | 2.75x | 0.97x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.29x | 1.00x |
| EPS | $5.13 | $2.84 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
FHI vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
Is FHI or AAPL a better buy in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), FHI has stronger fundamentals. FHI is rated STRONG BUY (88% confidence) while AAPL is rated BUY (87% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does FHI compare to AAPL fundamentally?
FEDERATED HERMES, INC. has ROE of 33.7% vs Apple Inc.'s 47.7%. Net margins are 22.4% vs 29.3% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, FHI or AAPL?
FHI has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while AAPL has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in FHI or AAPL for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that FHI has STRONG BUY rating with 88% confidence, while AAPL has BUY rating with 87% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about FHI vs AAPL?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For FHI vs AAPL, the AI consensus favors FHI based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.